![]() On top of it, Josh did the major damage to Tommy, not Keith. Josh basically says it was a factor, but the main reason was for Tommy’s car and money. You would think that if you found out your girlfriend was raped and killed that person, it would be the number one factor. How it could not have been a main motive blows my mind. When Josh says it wasn’t a defining factor for killing Tommy, I can’t help but think one of three things:ġ.) It didn’t happen 2.) Josh and Keith are scumbags for it not being a main motive 3.) There is more to the story than what she is saying I wanted to see if I could at least try and understand her viewpoint, but it just left me with a lot more questions. It makes no sense, and I don’t really know why she even bothered to say anything.Įdit: I had to rewatch the episode to see if I missed something. If Tommy did rape Tina, I don’t feel bad for him but I just don’t buy her story. It was pretty cringe worthy when she said she had a special place in her heart for him after betraying him. She didn’t do any of that, and if in fact she was raped I don’t think highly of her for doing what she did. I would think that if my boyfriend killed my rapist I wouldn’t turn him in, or I would be by his side and explain the situation. On top of it, Tina turns Keith and Josh in to the police for killing Tommy. The main motive seemed to be about money and a car. Like if that was a motive, it would have been spoken about. ![]() ![]() When this episode first starts, it’s never once mentioned that the motive to kill Tommy was because he raped Tina. Does anyone else feel like something is off about her claim of being sexually assaulted? There is just something about it that is not making sense to me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |